Buddhist 1: Kapilavatsu (5 points)

As a kid I never really read manga but I grew up with some of the shows that came from it like Dragon Ball Z and Tezuka's Astroboy. I didn't really pay much attention to the creators outside of the manga, however, I enjoyed the genre. When I think about manga today, I think the hyper detailed style which is, personally, a bit overwhelming sometimes, so Buddhist felt a lot more comfortable to read. It was easy to keep up with despite having several backstories of the different characters that, then, end up meeting together. I really liked the way that the style was very comic-like and not super emphasized which gave the actual story and plot to shine without the art style being too distracting and too perfect. I enjoyed that some panels did not required a speech bubble which gave me a chance to interpret the story and make it up in my head. It was neat. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Arrival (3 points)

 When I first opened the book I was not expecting it to be solely imaged. The first pages of pages, an introduction to the characters of the story I believe, felt more personal as I looked at them. Each portrait held its own emotions and stories without needing words. Each character, I could tell, will have a crucial part to the story.  As I kept reading I felt eerie. The illustrations have an overall grey-ish tone. The attention to detail of each one kept me engaged. The first chapter I interpreted as a goodbye, where the family is accompanying the father to wherever he will be departing from. Their surroundings were almost surreal and a mystery to me, the shadows of what looked like a giant serpent left me intrigued.  Overall, the story kept me engaged as I tried to figure out the purpose of the father leaving his family. He arrived in this place where life seemed better. He stayed and learned the ways of life and the customs of the people. He found friends who helped him get settled
Read more

The Killing Joke (5 points ?)

 1. The Killing Joke, and the Joker in general, was kind of my introduction to the DC/Batman world and I had previously watched the animated movie before reading the comic. I thought the comic brought out the darker parts of the story, and was able to fully bring the more graphic images and topics that an animated movie might have limitations to. I really liked the comic so much better than the movie and I think I was able to get a better tone of the Joker and his motive. You really get to see what made him, him. The Joker is still a terrible person but you really get to see what drove him to do what he did, and that was trying to provide for his wife, which I still believe is the only person he will ever love. I really liked seeing a clearer display of the relationship between the Joker and Batman; it really shows just how similar they can be. I've always portrayed them both as the worst married couple with the most toxic relationship in the world.  2-3. I was able to connect with
Read more

Understanding Comics (3 points)

  I have recently gotten more interested in comics, hence why I chose to take this class, but I never imagined the complexity that goes into making one, more specifically, the structural complexity. I know now that comics are way more than a simple story with sequential pictures inside panels. I see it now as a form of universal communication even though they come in different languages. What I found most interesting was how different comics by even more different artists follow a similar, if not the same, transitioning tools. His example where he takes Jack Kirby's and Stan Lee's  The Fantastic Four  comic and Herges's  Tintin.  In  Fantastic Four , Kirby's transitions consist of 65% action-to-action, about 20% subject-to-subject, and roughly 15% scene-to-scene. Now, even though  Tintin  comes from a different culture and both comics' styles are wildly different, their transitional tools are still the same. And that applied to American comics such as  X-men, Donald
Read more